MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387415240 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2023.3322579

MCTNet: Multiscale Cross-Attention-Based Transformer Network for Semantic Segmentation of Large-Scale Point Cloud

2023· article· en· W4387415240 on OpenAlexaff
Bo Guo, Liwei Deng, Ruisheng Wang, Wenchao Guo, Alex Hay‐Man Ng, Wenfeng Bai

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceData miningEncoderTransformerSegmentationFeature extractionSecurity tokenPattern recognition (psychology)Computer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we implement a hybrid method to utilize sufficient information by aggregating both fine-grained and globally contextual features for point cloud semantic segmentation with a hierarchical network. By surpassing the defects of convolution operation mainly for extracting low-level features, we combine higher-level cross-attention based Transformer to investigate the importance of long-range relations together with position embedding for multiscale feature representation. Specifically, adding a learnable token to the feature sequence of a layer, a Transformer encoder is first implemented with limited scope to embed these features. Furthermore, instead of performing all-to-all attention, we merely fuse tokens spanning various scales. To improve efficiency, we propose a simple yet efficient token-fusing architecture based on cross-attention, in which the computation of attention maps can be restricted within linear time by only using a token to calculate the query. The cross-attention module can be efficiently aggregated in a multiscale network to further enlarge the scope of the receptive field for attention. Experiments show that our MCTNet achieves promising results on three largest point cloud datasets, DALES, DublinCity and S3DIS datasets. For the DALES benchmark dataset, MCTNet improves the mean intersection-over-union (mIoU) to 83.3% and the overall accuracy (OA) to 98.3%, which outperforms other existing baselines. We also perform abundant ablation studies on various attention and normalization modules and discuss the effect of parameters to validate the descriptive power of cross-attention module and provide an understanding of how long-range dependency can be used to learn fair and unbiased features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingSame topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207