Estimation of Random Channel Gain for SISO Visible Light Communications System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, the estimation of random channel gain is studied for a single-input single-output (SISO) visible light communication (VLC) system. Five different estimators, namely maximum likelihood (ML), least square (LS), maximum posteriori probability (MAP), linear minimum mean square error (LMMSE), and minimum mean square error (MMSE), are proposed. The performances of these estimators are compared with the derived Bayesian Cramér–Rao lower bound (BCRLB), which can be used as a benchmark to evaluate the efficiency of the unbiased estimators. The presented analytical results, corroborated with Monte Carlo simulations, indicate that the MMSE estimator provides the best results. Additionally, the increasing number of pilot symbols as well as the ascending transmitted power improve the system performance. On the other hand, the noise variance has a negative effect on the channel estimation in terms of mean square error (MSE), and thus, it can dramatically reduce the performance of the estimators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".