The role of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in chondrocyte mechanotransduction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chondrocytes are mechanosensitive cells able to sense and respond to external mechanical stimuli through the process of mechanotransduction. Previous studies have demonstrated that mechanical stimulation causes mitochondrial deformation leading to mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) release in a dose-dependent manner. For this reason, we focused on elucidating the role of mitochondrial ROS as anabolic signaling molecules in chondrocyte mechanotransduction. Chondrocyte-seeded agarose gels were subjected to mechanical stimuli and the effect on matrix synthesis, ROS production, and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) signaling was evaluated. Through the use of ROS-specific staining, superoxide anion was the primary ROS released in response to mechanical stimuli. The anabolic effect of mechanical stimulation was abolished in the presence of electron transport chain inhibitors (complexes I, III, and V) and superoxide anion scavengers. Subsequent studies were centered on the involvement of MAPK pathways (ERK1/2, p38, and JNK) in the mechanotransduction cascade. While disruption of the ERK1/2 pathway had no apparent effect, the anabolic effect of mechanical stimulation was abolished in the presence of p38 and JNK pathway inhibitors. This suggest the involvement of apoptosis stimulating kinase 1 (ASK1), an upstream redox-sensitive MAP3K shared by both the JNK and p38 pathways. Future experiments will focus on the involvement of the thioredoxin-ASK1 complex which disassociates in the presence of oxidative stress, allowing ASK1 to phosphorylate several MAP2Ks. Overall, these findings indicate superoxide anion as the primary ROS released in response to mechanical stimuli and that the resulting anabolic effect on chondrogenic matrix biosynthesis arises from the ROS-dependent activation of the p38 and JNK MAPKs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".