Phase Engineering of Titanium Oxynitride System and Its Solar Light-Driven Photocatalytic Dye Degradation, H<sub>2</sub> Generation, and N<sub>2</sub> Fixation Properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present work, a phase engineering strategy is explored toward forming a titanium oxynitride (TiO x N y ) phase by nitriding a sol–gel-derived TiO 2 -based precursor at different nitridation temperatures ranging from 450 °C to 950 °C in an ammonia gas environment. The evolved Ti-oxynitride phase is confirmed using XRD, Rietveld refinement, micro-Raman, and HRTEM lattice fringes analysis. Various physicochemical properties of the Ti-oxynitride phase are investigated in comparison with the Ti-oxide and nitride phases obtained in this study. The XPS analysis of oxynitride phase shows dual +3/+4 oxidation states of Ti, which can be attributed to Ti–N and Ti–O network in the oxynitride system. The optical absorption and band gap energy of Ti-oxynitride are found to be favorably altered, compared to the typical Ti-oxides, which are attributed to the plasmonic material-like feature of Ti-nitride phase in the system. From the time-resolved photoluminescence spectra, lifetime of the excited carriers in oxide, nitride, and oxynitride systems is estimated to be ∼3.89, 3.83, and 4.59 ns, respectively, which ascribed to the Ohmic-interface-driven improved electron delocalization in oxynitride phase and corroborated with various photoelectrochemical analysis using voltammetry (cyclic and linear sweep), impedance, and photocurrent measurements. The photocatalytic dye degradation (expressed as a percentage), H 2 evolution (in units of μmol g –1 h –1 ) and NH 3 formation (in units of μmol g –1 h –1 ) over the developed Ti-oxynitride system (∼91–96/1278.2/215) is found to be improved compared to the sole oxide (∼85–88/458.6/102) and nitride (∼79–77/619.32/174) systems. The UV–visible light to H 2 conversion efficiency of the developed oxynitride system is estimated to be ∼2.55%. The manifested improved photocatalytic efficiency of oxynitride could be attributed to the synergy of oxide-nitride phases facilitating the effective light harvesting properties via plasmonic features and inter/intratransfer of charge carriers in the system via Ohmic contacts, which eventually promote the multifacet redox reactions toward various photocatalytic applications, as demonstrated in this study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".