Clinical features and pregnancy outcomes in women with aortopulmonary window defect: case series
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Aortopulmonary window is a rare congenital heart defect that results in severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), Eisenmenger syndrome, and congestive heart failure in the first months of life. Pregnancy is absolutely contraindicated in the patients with this condition. Case summary: This paper describes two clinical cases of pregnancy in patients (28 and 20 years old) with aortopulmonary window defect, severe PAH, and Eisenmenger syndrome that ended in preterm delivery by caesarean section. One patient died in the postpartum period due to progression of right ventricular heart failure. The younger patient survived childbirth and the postpartum period; later, she continued therapy at the PAH centre. Discussion: We describe unusual cases of clinical features in pregnant women with aortopulmonary window defect. Due to the rare occurrence and low survival rate of patients with uncorrected aortopulmonary window defect, descriptions of clinical cases of this defect in adults are very rare. It is very important to note the necessity of observation of these patients in specialized centres by a multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals, due to the high risk of cardiovascular, obstetric complications, and death.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it