MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387446991 · doi:10.2118/214983-ms

Accurate Prediction of the Saturation Pressures of Hydrocarbons in Unconventional Reservoirs: A Modified Alpha-Function for the Peng-Robinson Equation of State

2023· article· en· W4387446991 on OpenAlexaff
Lixing Lin, Tayfun Babadagli, Huazhou Li

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSaturation (graph theory)Equation of statePorous mediumThermodynamicsMaterials scienceWork (physics)Experimental dataPhase (matter)PorosityNanoporousWater saturationChemistryPhysicsNanotechnologyComposite materialMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Due to the confinement and strong adsorption to the pore wall in meso- and nano- pores, fluid phase behavior in the confined media, such as the tight and shale reservoirs, can be significantly different from that in the bulk phase. A large amount of work has been done on the theoretical modeling of the phase behavior of hydrocarbons in the confined media. However, there are still inconsistencies in the theoretical models developed and validations of those models against experimental data are inadequate. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive review of experimental work on the phase behavior of hydrocarbons under confinement and analyzed various theoretical phase-behavior models. Emphasis was given to the modifications to the Peng-Robinson equation of state (PR EoS). Through the comparative analysis, we developed a modified alpha-function in PR EoS for accurate prediction of the saturation pressures of hydrocarbons in porous media. This modified alpha-function accounts for the pore size and was derived based on the regression results through minimizing the deviation between the experimentally measured and numerically calculated saturation pressure data. Meanwhile, the thermodynamic properties of propane were calculated in the bulk phase and in the nanopores. Finally, we validated the newly developed model using the experimental data generated within our research group. By applying the modified PR EoS, a more accurate representation of the experimentally measured saturation pressure data in confined nanopores was achieved. This newly developed model not only enhanced the accuracy of the predictions but also provided valuable insights into the confinement effects on the phase behavior of hydrocarbons in nanopores. Notably, we observed significant changes in the properties of propane within confined nanopores, including suppressed saturation pressure and fugacity, indicating a greater tendency for the gas to remain in the liquid phase. Additionally, the gas compressibility factor and enthalpy of vaporization were found to increase highlighting increased difficulty in transitioning from liquid to gas phase under confinement. To validate its applicability, the newly developed model was applied to the experimental data obtained in real rock samples. Interestingly, it was observed that the phase change in these samples predominantly occurred in the smallest pores. This finding highlights the importance of considering the pore size distribution when studying the phase behavior of hydrocarbons in a capillary medium even if the rock has high permeability. This study provided a simple and easy-to-implement modification to the PR EoS for accurate prediction of the phase behavior of petroleum fluids under confinement. The modification to PR EoS was more straightforward and simplified compared to the modifications available in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Annual Technical Conference and ExhibitionSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207