MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387448492 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3322698

Multicamera Collaboration for 3-D Visualization via Correlated Information Maximization

2023· article· en· W4387448492 on OpenAlexafffund
Ruitao Chen, Biwei Li, Xianbin Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsComputer scienceVisualizationMaximizationData visualizationInformation visualizationInformation retrievalHuman–computer interactionData miningMathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A critical component for various interactive visual Internet of Things (IoT) applications is to reconstruct 3-D scenes from RGB images, i.e., 3-D visualization. When multiple cameras are involved, the visualization outcome mainly depends on the quality of input images, which carry correlated and complementary visual information from different camera perspectives. One main challenge to improve visualization performance is how to efficiently coordinate multiple cameras under complex environmental conditions. To overcome this challenge, we propose a situation-aware multicamera collaboration scheme based on the maximization of correlated information among different inputs. First, the information gain of a single camera is modeled by quantifying the effect of view direction, resolution and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on image quality. A spherical Gaussian is then designed to model the mutual information among neighboring viewpoints and further calculate the total correlated information of the camera group by considering their information redundancy and complementarity. An adaptive coarse-to-fine algorithm is proposed to maximize the correlated information, which achieves effective decision making of optimal multicamera collaboration strategy, including cameras’ location, direction, and focal length configurations. Simulation and realistic experiments demonstrate the accuracy of the correlated information model and the efficacy of the scheme to improve reconstruction quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.005
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207