Multicamera Collaboration for 3-D Visualization via Correlated Information Maximization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A critical component for various interactive visual Internet of Things (IoT) applications is to reconstruct 3-D scenes from RGB images, i.e., 3-D visualization. When multiple cameras are involved, the visualization outcome mainly depends on the quality of input images, which carry correlated and complementary visual information from different camera perspectives. One main challenge to improve visualization performance is how to efficiently coordinate multiple cameras under complex environmental conditions. To overcome this challenge, we propose a situation-aware multicamera collaboration scheme based on the maximization of correlated information among different inputs. First, the information gain of a single camera is modeled by quantifying the effect of view direction, resolution and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on image quality. A spherical Gaussian is then designed to model the mutual information among neighboring viewpoints and further calculate the total correlated information of the camera group by considering their information redundancy and complementarity. An adaptive coarse-to-fine algorithm is proposed to maximize the correlated information, which achieves effective decision making of optimal multicamera collaboration strategy, including cameras’ location, direction, and focal length configurations. Simulation and realistic experiments demonstrate the accuracy of the correlated information model and the efficacy of the scheme to improve reconstruction quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".