Simultaneous Localization and Communications With Massive MIMO-OTFS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Next generation cellular network is expected to provide the simultaneous high-accuracy localization and ultra-reliable communication services, even in high mobility scenarios. To that end, the novel orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) modulation has been developed as a promising physical-layer transmission technique, evident by the outstanding performance in terms of robustness against time-frequency selective fading over the orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) counterpart. However, when OTFS meets massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO), the specific conditions, under which the delay-Doppler (DD) domain channel model holds, are not identified. In addition, the channel estimation and localization performance in such system is rarely studied. In this work, we target at these new challenges, and conduct comprehensive modelling, performance analysis, and algorithm design for massive MIMO-OTFS based simultaneous localization and communications. Specifically, we derive new channel models for the massive MIMO-OTFS system, which captures both time-frequency dispersion and spatial wideband effects. The specific conditions, under which the new models hold has been unveiled as well. Based on the new models, we establish the theoretical foundations for channel estimation and localization, by deriving the Cramér-Rao lower bounds of channel parameter and location estimation errors. Such bounds have been achieved with the newly designed low-complexity channel estimation and localization algorithms. Numerical simulations of the proposed framework with prevailing pulse functions are also conducted and the results validate the proposed designs and analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".