MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387457480 · doi:10.3390/psf2023008062

Measurement of Atmospheric Muon Neutrino Disappearance Using CNN Reconstructions with IceCube

2023· article· en· W4387457480 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Shiqi Yu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOffice of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive ResearchDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronOffice of Polar ProgramsCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaHelmholtz Alliance for Astroparticle PhysicsRWTH Aachen UniversityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaKnut och Alice Wallenbergs StiftelseBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungNational Science FoundationBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonVetenskapsrådetU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of Advanced CyberinfrastructureEuropean CommissionWestern Canada Research GridFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSPolarforskningssekretariatetVillum FondenFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNvidiaMichigan State UniversityMarquette University
KeywordsPhysicsNeutrinoNeutrino detectorNeutrino astronomyMuonCherenkov radiationSolar neutrinoObservatoryNeutrino oscillationSolar neutrino problemDetectorAstronomyParticle physicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The IceCube Neutrino Observatory is a Cherenkov detector located at the South Pole, instrumenting a cubic kilometer of ice. The DeepCore subdetector is located at the lower center of the IceCube array, and has denser configuration that has improved ability to see GeV-scale neutrinos in the detector. Convolutional neural networks (CNN) are used to reconstruct neutrino interactions in DeepCore, achieving comparable performance to the current likelihood-based method but with roughly 3000 times faster processing speeds. In this study, we present a preliminary atmospheric muon neutrino disappearance analysis using the CNN-reconstructed neutrino sample, and the sensitivity to neutrino oscillation parameter measurements is shown and compared to the recent IceCube results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207