MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Middle Devonian Evandale porphyry Cu-Mo (Au) deposit, southwestern New Brunswick, Canada: Analysis of petrogenesis to potential as a source for distal intrusion-related epithermal gold mineralization

2023· article· en· W4387458553 on OpenAlexaffabout
Fazilat Yousefi, Travis White, David R. Lentz, Christopher R.M. McFarlane, Kathleen G. Thorne

Bibliographic record

VenueOre Geology Reviews · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryZirconPorphyriticBiotiteMaficQuartz monzonitePetrologyPlutonQuartzTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 391.2 ± 3.2 Ma (U-Pb on zircon) Evandale Granodiorite of southwestern New Brunswick is quite a unique intrusive rock in the southern part of the northeastern Appalachians. This research examines the relationship between the porphyry Cu-Mo-(Au) and epithermal systems with Evandale Granodiorite and environs. This Middle Devonian multi-phase I-type granite intrudes along the northern boundary of the deformed Silurian sedimentary and mafic volcanic rocks of the Mascarene Basin. This granitoid is identified as an oxidized I-type system with adakitic geochemical signatures and associated porphyry Cu-Mo-(Au) mineralization, possibly linked to slab failure sourced from decompression melting of the lower crust caused by post-collisional uplift, similar to the Magaguadavic Granite to the southwest. The Evandale adakitic intrusion is divided into two phases that consist of (1) a calc-alkalic coarser phase ranging from medium- to coarse-grained, seriate to porphyritic granodiorite to monzogranite with metaluminous to peraluminous features, and (2) the later stage alkali-calcic fine-grained (to aplitic) locally porphyritic phase ranging from a monzogranite to syeno-granite with peraluminous characteristics. The primary mineralogy of the intrusive rocks consists of K-feldspar + albite + plagioclase + quartz + biotite + hornblende + apatite ± muscovite ± zircon, along with several alteration phases, such as biotite, chlorite, sericite, and calcite. Geochemical analyses (using INAA, ICP-MS, and XRF) indicate that both phases of the Evandale granodiorite show a high concentration of Cu (108 ppm) and Au (33 ppb) associated with the presence of pyrite, chalcopyrite, and arsenopyrite in the fine-grained dyke samples. Up to 6 ppm Mo was contained within the granitic phase, whereas lesser amounts of Mo were confined to the fine grained to aplite phases. Microprobe analyses of primary biotite as both phenocrysts and groundmass shows 0.55 avg. wt.% Cl and 0.21 avg. wt.% F, which are relatively concentrated compared to other high-grade porphyry deposits. Hydrothermally altered rocks, veins, and sulfides associated with the porphyritic suite result from buoyant magmatic-hydrothermal fluids from a deeper intrusion exsolving fluids (quenched porphyry related), depressurizing, and reacting with the host coarser grained granodiorite and even some of the dykes locally. Based on the geothermometry and geobarometry of amphibole (actinolite-magnesiohornblende), the crystallization temperature and pressure of the Evandale coarse-grained granite and aplite are 674-755 °C, 0.2-0.7 kbar (20-70 MPa) and 838 °C, 0.42-1.4 kbar (42-140 MPa), respectively. This is consistent with biotite formation at temperatures ranging from 670° to 760°C, based on Ti-in-biotite thermometry. Also, zircon saturation temperatures of the earlier coarse-grained porphyritic granites and later fine-grained porphyry to aplitic dykes are 736 °C and 787 °C, respectively. Spatially and temporally associated gold deposits beside Evandale and within this region of southwestern New Brunswick suggests that these oxidized I-type intrusions are a potential source for distal low sulfidation epithermal gold deposits in the region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOre Geology ReviewsSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207