MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387459046 · doi:10.1080/10406638.2023.2264451

Transmittal Effect Evaluation of Heterocyclic Rings on Nonlinear Optical Ambit of Benzotrithiophene-Based Push-Pull Driving Materials: a Theoretical Approach

2023· article· en· W4387459046 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolycyclic aromatic compounds · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNonlinear Optical Materials Research
Canadian institutionsNorthern Alberta Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThiopheneChemistryChromophorePyrroleNonlinear opticalMolecular orbitalAtomic orbitalNatural bond orbitalComputational chemistryDensity functional theoryMoleculeCrystallographyPhotochemistryOrganic chemistryNonlinear systemPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To obtain extensive insights into NLO properties, herein, two series of benzotrithiophene (BTT) based organic compounds (MS1-MS5 and MP1-MP5) containing D1-π1-D2-π2-A-type framework have been designed. The structural tailoring was accomplished via the incorporation of thiophene and pyrrole units in MS1-MS5 and MP1-MP5, respectively at the region of π2 in each derivative. Quantum chemical calculations including: frontier molecular orbitals (FMOs), natural population analysis (NPA), UV-Vis investigation, transition density matrix (TDMx), density of state (DOS), molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) and natural bond orbitals (NBOs) analyses were accomplished at MPW1PW91/6-311G(d,p) functional to determine the influence of π-linkers on the optical response of designed chromophores. Conclusively, remarkable NLO results were obtained for thiophene-based derivatives (MS1-MS5) as compared to pyrrole-based derivatives (MP1-MP5). Interestingly, among all the derivatives, minimum Egap values of 2.248 and 2.264 eV were observed for MS4 and MS5, respectively, and the Egap values were found in the following decreasing order: MS1>MS3>MS2>MS5>MS4. Surprisingly, MS4 and MS5 displayed maximum amplitudes of < α> i.e., 2.44 × 10−22 and 2.65 × 10−22 esu as well as < γ> such as: 3.91 × 10−32 and 4.35 × 10−32 esu, respectively. Moreover, the declining trend of < γ> was observed as follows: MS5 > MS4 > MS2 > MS3 > MS1. In a nutshell, this investigation may provide a new insight for the use of these BTT-based organic chromophores especially MS4 and MS5 for potential NLO-based hi-tech applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it