60 years of the Kaye–Bernstein, Kearsley, Zapas rheological constitutive law for polymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The K–BKZ (Kaye–Bernstein, Kearsley, Zapas) rheological constitutive model is now 60 years old. The paper reviews the connections of the model and its variants with continuum mechanics and experimental evidence in polymer melt flow, presenting an up-to-date recap of research and major findings in the open literature. In the Introduction, an historical perspective is given on developments in the last 60 years of the K–BKZ model. Then, a section on mathematical modeling of polymer flows follows, including the governing equations of flow, the rheological constitutive equations (with emphasis on the viscoelastic integral constitutive equations of the K–BKZ type), dimensionless numbers controlling the flow, and relevant boundary conditions. The “Method of Solution” section reviews the major developments of numerical techniques for particle tracking and integral evaluation for the viscoelastic stresses. Finally, selected examples of successful application of the K–BKZ model in polymer flows are presented including considerations of wall slip and non-isothermal flows.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".