MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387460903 · doi:10.1101/2023.10.05.561129

Profiling Chromatin Accessibility in Humans Using Adenine Methylation and Long-Read Sequencing

2023· preprint· en· W4387460903 on OpenAlexafffund
Vahid Akbari, Sreeja Leelakumari, Steven J.M. Jones

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre
KeywordsChromatinNanopore sequencingDNA methylationComputational biologyBiologyCpG siteDNA sequencingDNAProfiling (computer programming)GenomeGeneticsEpigenomicsNanoporeGeneComputer scienceNanotechnologyGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Chromatin accessibility demonstrates accessible DNA regions that usually have regulatory function. Several studies have demonstrated DNA accessibility profiling using nanopore sequencing and GpC or adenine modification. However, the GpC dinucleotide is not evenly distributed across the genome and there are regions sparse in GpC. 6mA studies have demonstrated chromatin accessibility in yeast using nanopore based sequencing, although a high-false positive in 6mA detection rate and low coverage have previously precluded the effective use in mammalian sized genomes. Here, we have developed accurate 6mA base calling and demonstrated high-resolution profiling of accessible regions and simultaneous CpG methylation detection in humans using long read sequencing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207