MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387461284 · doi:10.1080/03610918.2023.2266153

A Bayesian semiparametric regression model for current status data

2023· article· en· W4387461284 on OpenAlex
Pavithra Hariharan, P. G. Sankaran, Asokan Mulayath Variyath

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCovariateCensoring (clinical trials)Proportional hazards modelBayesian probabilityStatisticsEconometricsRegression analysisComputer scienceModel selectionGibbs samplingMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In survival analysis, interval censoring case I or current status censoring happens if each subject is observed only once for status of occurrence of the event of interest. Current status data often appear along with covariates in cross sectional studies and tumorigenicity studies. Cox’s proportional hazards model has been widely used to explore the relationship between lifetime variable and covariates. In this paper we propose a novel and easy to implement Bayesian approach for analyzing current status data. Under proportional hazards model, baseline survival function and regression parameters are estimated assuming proper prior distributions and implementing Metropolis Hastings algorithm for posterior computation. Methods for both model selection and model validation are suggested. Finite sample performance of the proposed method is evaluated using simulation studies. Intraocular lenses calcification data are analyzed for illustration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score0.666

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.610
GPT teacher head0.592
Teacher spread0.018 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it