Bibliographic record
Abstract
According to the analysis of the general distribution and research status of Yao ceremonial paintings in Southeast Asia, the United States, Canada, France and other places, this paper explains the cultural functions of overseas Yao ceremonial paintings. It is believed that the ceremonial painting was an important carrier of cultural memory and cultural identity of overseas Yao people. The artistic characteristics and cultural connotation of Yao ritual painting are the most prominent among Yao folk art. The religious beliefs and ideas contained in Yao ritual paintings provide valuable evidence for us to study Yao traditional culture and its connotation. The collection of overseas Yao ritual paintings is also the material carrier of overseas Yao cultural historical memory, religious belief, national emotion maintenance and cultural identity. The Yao sacrificial paintings record the legend of Pan Wang, Long drum, Ox horn, and the historical legend and story of Yao crossing the sea. This study finds that the collection of ritual paintings overseas is not only helpful to explore the life, customs, religious beliefs and other national cultures of the Yao people overseas, but also helpful to explore the changes of the traditional culture of the Yao people overseas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".