Efficient Privacy-Preserving Task Allocation With Secret Sharing for Vehicular Crowdsensing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vehicular crowdsensing (VCS) has emerged as a promising paradigm, in which spatio-temporal-based sensing tasks are outsourced to intelligent connected vehicles (ICVs) carrying sensor-equipped devices. A critical issue of VCS is to guarantee the spatio-temporal sensing coverage by assigning tasks to appropriate vehicles, which inevitably requires vehicles’ precise locations or trajectories and thus raises location privacy concerns. To address this problem, we propose a novel secret sharing-based efficient privacy-preserving task allocation scheme for VCS, which can select sensing vehicles with approximately optimal total spatio-temporal coverage based on their future trajectories while achieving strong location privacy preservation for users (customers and sensing vehicles). With a grid-based region encoding method, a user’s location information is encoded as a binary array, termed as the region code. Based on the idea of secret sharing, we design a bit-wise XOR-based secret splitting method to split a user’s region code into two random shares and separately transmit them to two fog servers, thereby perfectly hiding the original location information. With a carefully-designed code permutation mechanism and a greedy task allocation algorithm, the cloud server and fog servers can efficiently collaborate and complete task allocation based on permuted region codes without revealing users’ location information. Detailed security analysis shows that our proposed scheme effectively preserves users’ location privacy. Extensive experiments conducted on a realistic traffic scenario data set also demonstrate that it is efficient in communication and computation while achieving large total spatio-temporal coverage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".