Correction: Continuous Subcutaneous Foslevodopa/Foscarbidopa in Parkinson’s Disease: Safety and Efficacy Results From a 12-Month, Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the sentences beginning ‘At baseline,...’ and ‘The reduction of early morning...’ in the section ‘Efficacy’ under the heading ‘Results’ in this article, the n/N values ‘129/238, 20/139, 25/125 and 56/125’ were incorrect and the correct sentences should have read as follows: At baseline, 77.7% (n/N = 129/166) of patients experienced morning akinesia, which decreased to 19.2% (n/N = 20/104) at week 26, and 27.8% (n/N = 25/90) at week 52. The reduction of early morning “Off” time was accompanied by a marked increase in the proportion of patients reporting “On” time without dyskinesia on awakening (62.2%; n/N = 56/90 at week 52) (Fig. 3). In the sentence beginning ‘The reduction of “Off” time is particularly exemplified by...’ under the heading “Discussion”, the value ‘(changed from 17.5% at baseline to 63.0% at week 52)’ should have read ‘(changed from 17.5% at baseline to 62.2% at week 52).’ The original article has been corrected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".