Some aspects of cooperation of the Turkic peoples in Turkish sources and historiography (the end of 19th – first quarter of the 20 centuries)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The end of the 19th - the first quarter of the 20th centuries is characterized by a heavy burden in the history of the Turkic peoples: the policy of spiritual colonization of Tsarist Russia was in full swing, the Jadid and Turkic movements were gaining strength, the Turkic peoples strengthened their solidarity within the framework of these ideas, as a result of two revolutions, the entire structure 90М.Ш. Эгамбердиев, А.М. Азмұханова Turkic Studies Journal 3 (2023) 72-91of Russia’s imperialist policy changed, the Bolshevik policy of atheism, famine and repression was implemented. This period has been comprehensively studied in domestic historiography and its «blank pages» continue to be revealed today. However, this historical period has not yet been studied in the sources and historiography of Turkey, which is a fraternal country. The main sources of the chronological period we have chosen are preserved in the archives of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Turkey, the Ottoman state libraries and the rare collections of the National Library in Ankara. Studies and historiographical bases connected with the problems of the Turkic peoples’ cooperation were considered from two perspectives. The main purpose of the article is a comprehensive analysis of the Turkic peoples’ cooperation since the end of the 19th – first quarter of the 20th centuries in Turkish sources and historiography. To achieve this goal, Turkish sources and materials stored in the archives were classified by comparative analysis, and on this basis the problems of Jadid movement, Turkism and Islam, Muslim issues, national identity, and political-cultural struggle based on the principle of historicism were analyzed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it