MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387482395 · doi:10.1515/9780887554261-001

Acknowledgements

2012· book-chapter· en· W4387482395 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Manitoba Press eBooks · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHuman auditory perception and evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oleepika Saullu Nashalik, Maryann Shoapik, Sakiasie Sowdlooapik, and Peter Young for their generosity, hospitality, friendship, and good teachings.I was fortunate, also, to meet Marie-Lucie Uviluq from Igloolik, who taught me a great deal in a short time.I would like to honour the late Noah Metuq and the late Towkie Etuangat, both kind and patient teachers,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5970.405

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Manitoba Press eBooksSame topicHuman auditory perception and evaluationFrench-language works237,207