MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387483590 · doi:10.1088/1361-6668/ad01ec

A sulfurization method for creating the buffer-layers current flow diverter architecture in REBa<sub>2</sub>Cu<sub>3</sub>O<sub>7</sub> coated conductors

2023· article· en· W4387483590 on OpenAlexaff
Pedro Barusco, J. S. R. Giguère, Christian Lacroix, Frédéric Sirois, X. Granados, Teresa Puig, X. Obradors

Bibliographic record

VenueSuperconductor Science and Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersH2020 Industrial LeadershipHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeEuropean Regional Development FundGeneralitat de CatalunyaMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadH2020 EnvironmentDepartament d'Innovació, Universitats i Empresa, Generalitat de Catalunya
KeywordsFabricationMaterials scienceElectrical conductorMicrostructureSuperconductivityOptoelectronicsComposite materialCondensed matter physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The current flow diverter (CFD) is a known concept that has proven to effectively reduce the probability of destructive hot spots in REBa2Cu3O7 (REBCO; RE = rare earth) coated conductors (CCs) by boosting the normal zone propagation velocity. However, the implementation of the CFD concept requires additional steps in a fabrication process that is already complex and has struggled to find a simple reel-to-reel fabrication method. This work reports on the details of a fabrication route for the buffer-layers-CFD (bCFD) architecture using a solid-vapor silver sulfurization technique to tune the geometry of the metal stabilizer in the high-temperature superconductor tape. The analysis of the microstructure and superconducting properties of the Ag2S/Ag/GdBCO trilayer processed under different conditions shows how we achieved a new customized functional CC with the bCFD architecture. In DC limitation experiments, this bCFD-sulfide architecture allowed to generate an electric potential much faster than the conventional architecture (60 V s−1 vs. 1.2 V s−1) thanks to the strong enhancement of the NPZV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSuperconductor Science and TechnologySame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207