xSA: A Binary Cross-Entropy Simulated Annealing Polar Decoder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polar decoders such as successive-cancellation and successive-cancellation list decoders are limited by their sequential nature, which leads to a linear increase in latency with the codeword length. Heuristic based decoders such as quantum annealing have been proposed to overcome this limitation. However, these decoders have shown poor performance when decoding polar codes with more than eight bits. In this paper, we developed new meta-heuristic based polar decoder, called xSA, which uses a new receiver constraint modeled by the binary cross-entropy function. We also propose a method to determine the weights used in a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) function. The polar code is assumed to have been sent across an AWGN channel and we conducted our experiments and simulations using PyQUBO and dwave-neal. Our results show that xSA is able to decode codes of length 16 and 32 with a near-ML FER performance, presenting itself as a promising alternative to traditional polar decoders for real world applications and next generation cellular communications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".