MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387491138 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2023.3323563

Integrated Sensing and Communication in mmWave Wireless Backhaul Networks

2023· article· en· W4387491138 on OpenAlexaff
Yue Cui, Haichuan Ding, Sheng Ke, Lian Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceWirelessScheduling (production processes)Backhaul (telecommunications)Bandwidth (computing)ThroughputWireless networkComputer networkCommunications systemReal-time computingDistributed computingElectronic engineeringEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) becomes prevailing in wireless communications since it fully exploits the spectrum resources by incorporating data transmission and potential sensing functionalities of radio networks. With large bandwidth and directional communication, millimeter wave has the potentials for high data-rate communications and favorable time and spatial domain resolution, which can provide extensive sensing functionalities if properly utilized. Since self-backhauling at mm Wave bands is considered a promising technology to enable high-throughput networks, we investigate how to embed ISAC functions into mm Wave network by jointly considering high-speed data transmissions and high accuracy localization. To maximize the utilization of mm Wave BSs for sensing and communication, we study the problem of optimal sensing task allocation taking into account target location, the requirements of different sensing tasks, user distribution, link scheduling, and data routing. With ISAC operations in mind, we analyze the time needed to complete each sensing task to facilitate problem formulation. To overcome the computational complexity in solution finding, we propose a sensing-oriented column generation (SOCG) scheme, which is shown to achieve near optimal performance via extensive performance evaluation. Furthermore, evaluation results demonstrate that the obtained sensing task allocation provides good throughput performance while ensuring the requirements of sensing tasks are satisfied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score0.582

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and ModelingFrench-language works237,207