An Automated System to Monitor River Ice Conditions Using Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite Imagery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents an innovative, automated deep learning-based technique for near real-time satellite monitoring of river ice conditions in northern watersheds of the United States and Canada. The method leverages high-resolution imagery from the VIIRS bands onboard the NOAA-20 and NPP satellites and employs the U-Net deep learning algorithm for the semantic segmentation of images under varying cloud and land surface conditions. The system autonomously generates detailed maps delineating classes such as water, land, vegetation, snow, river ice, cloud, and cloud shadow. The verification of system outputs was performed quantitatively by comparing with existing ice extent maps in the northeastern US and New Brunswick, Canada, yielding a Probability of Detection of 0.77 and a False Alarm rate of 0.12, suggesting commendable accuracy. Qualitative assessments were also conducted, corroborating the reliability of the system and underscoring its utility in monitoring hydraulic and hydrological processes across northern watersheds. The system’s proficiency in accurately capturing the phenology of river ice, particularly during onset and breakup times, testifies to its potential as a valuable tool in the realm of river ice monitoring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".