MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387506287 · doi:10.53555//sfs.v10i1.1681

Youth Unemployment In India: A Multifaceted And Tenacious Challenge

2023· article· en· W4387506287 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Navneet Saini, Deepinder Kaur, Sajad Ahmad Mir

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProsperityYouth unemploymentUnemploymentVocational educationEntrepreneurshipEconomic shortageEconomic growthPsychological interventionPandemicDevelopment economicsPolitical scienceEconomicsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PsychologyGovernment (linguistics)Medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores into the intricate issue of youth unemployment in India, a multifaceted challenge that persists despite the nation's ongoing economic growth. The problem is deeply rooted in several interrelated factors, including deficiencies in the education system, a shortage of job opportunities, and demographic pressures. The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated this problem. To combat youth unemployment effectively, a comprehensive approach is essential. This includes reforming the education system to align with the demands of a rapidly evolving job market, expanding vocational training and skill development programs, fostering entrepreneurship, and encouraging innovation. Additionally, investments in infrastructure and key industries, as well as robust social safety nets, are vital components of the solution. While the challenge is formidable, with concerted efforts and strategic policy interventions, India can harness the potential of its youth and steer the nation toward sustained economic growth and prosperity

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.293
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.003 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Survey in Fisheries SciencesSame topicCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsFrench-language works237,207