MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387516078 · doi:10.1002/trc2.12424

Temporal associations between treated and untreated hearing loss and mild behavioral impairment in older adults without dementia

2023· article· en· W4387516078 on OpenAlexafffund
Penny Gosselin, Dylan X. Guan, Eric E. Smith, Zahinoor Ismail

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryAlberta HealthHotchkiss Brain InstituteAlberta Health Services
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institute on AgingNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsDementiaHazard ratioHearing lossAudiologyLogistic regressionMedicineOdds ratioProportional hazards modelCognitive impairmentCognitionPsychologyConfidence intervalDemographyInternal medicinePsychiatryDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract INTRODUCTION Hearing loss (HL) and mild behavioral impairment (MBI) are non‐cognitive markers of dementia. This study investigated the relationship between hearing and MBI and explored the influence of hearing aid use on the treatment of hearing loss, both cross‐sectionally and longitudinally. METHODS Data were analyzed from National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center participants, age ≥50, dementia‐free at baseline, collected between 2005 and 2022. Three self‐report questions were used to generate a three‐level categorical hearing variable: No‐HL, Untreated‐HL, and Treated‐HL. MBI status was derived from the informant‐rated Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI‐Q) using a published algorithm. At baseline ( n = 7080), logistic regression was used to examine the association between hearing status (predictor) and the presence of global and domain‐specific MBI (outcome), adjusting for age, sex, cognitive diagnosis, and apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4). Cox proportional hazard models with time‐dependent covariates were used to examine the effect of (1) hearing status as exposure on the rate of incident MBI ( n = 5889); and (2) MBI as exposure on the rate of incident HL in those with no HL at baseline ( n = 6252). RESULTS Cross‐sectionally, participants with Untreated‐HL were more likely to exhibit global MBI (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.24–2.21) and individual MBI domains of social inappropriateness (aOR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.06–3.39), affective dysregulation (aOR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.21–2.38), and impulse dyscontrol (aOR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.21–2.38), compared to those with No‐HL. Participants with Treated‐HL (i.e., hearing aid use) did not differ from No‐HL for odds of global or most MBI domains, except for impulse dyscontrol (aOR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.05–1.81). Longitudinally, we found relationships between Treated‐HL and incident MBI (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.01–1.63) and between MBI and incident Untreated‐HL (aHR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.19–1.94). DISCUSSION Our cross‐sectional results support that hearing aid use is associated with lower odds of concurrent global MBI in dementia‐free participants. Longitudinally, relationships were found between MBI and HL. The severity of HL was not assessed, however, and may require further exploration. Highlights Hearing Loss (HL) and mild behavioral impairment (MBI) are markers of dementia Cross‐sectionally: Untreated‐HL was associated with global MBI burden, but HL treated with hearing aids was not We found associations between MBI and incident Untreated‐HL

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.380
GPT teacher head0.519
Teacher spread0.139 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical InterventionsSame topicHearing Loss and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207