MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387516512 · doi:10.1016/j.vgie.2023.09.012

The cliff descending method to facilitate parallel view during endoscopic submucosal dissection in the gastric fornix

2023· article· en· W4387516512 on OpenAlexaff
Douglas Motomura, Toshitatsu Takao, Mizuho Nagaki, Madoka Takao, Yoshinori Morita, Takashi Toyonaga, Yuzo Kodama

Bibliographic record

VenueVideoGIE · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFornixMedicineCliffInternal medicineGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become standard of care for treatment of early gastric cancers worldwide. As procedural expertise grows, the locations and types of lesions that can be endoscopically resected have expanded. The gastric fornix is considered one of the most challenging locations because of the pooling of fluid and blood over the lesion, poor maneuverability of the endoscope, and en face position of the muscle wall during dissection in retroflexion. Dissection in a forward view is often impossible because of the severe angulation at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVideoGIESame topicGastrointestinal disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207