Tipping points in freshwater ecosystems: an evidence map
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Freshwater ecosystems face numerous threats, including habitat alteration, invasive species, pollution, over extraction of resources, fragmentation, and climate change. When these threats intensify and/or combine with each other, their impacts can shift the ecosystem past a tipping point, producing a major and potentially irreversible shift in state, called a regime shift. We generated an evidence map to assess the current state of knowledge on tipping points in freshwater ecosystems. Our evidence mapping exercise revealed large knowledge gaps. Specifically, there are relatively few studies that explore the effects of tipping points in relation to (1) lotic systems (i.e., rivers, streams), (2) amphibians, mammals, or reptiles, and (3) the interactive impacts of multiple threats. In addition, most studies tended to have short study durations (<1 year), and few studies explored the reversibility of an ecosystem change after a tipping point was crossed. Concentrating future research on these gaps to improve understanding of tipping points in freshwater ecosystems in a holistic manner is important to help develop tools to forecast (and thus mitigate) the emergence and effects of tipping points, as well as to guide restoration actions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".