Wakefield damping in a distributed coupling linear accelerator
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The number of cells in a π-mode standing wave (SW) accelerating structure for the Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) project is limited by mode overlap with nearby modes. The distributed coupling scheme avoids mode overlap by treating each cell as independent. Designs of cells suitable for distributed coupling with strong wakefield suppression by waveguide damping have not previously been studied. In this paper we develop a SW cell to be used in a distributed coupling structure that can satisfy the CLIC transverse wake potential limit. From the middle cell of the CLIC-G* travelling wave (TW) structure, a SW cell is designed and then adapted to perform as a cell in a distributed coupling structure. Its wake potentials in an ideal case of open boundaries are reduced to satisfy the wake potential threshold. An electric boundary is added to the model to simulate total reflection at the distribution network. A horizontal coupler cell that connects to the distribution network such that the reflected wakefields remain similar to the open boundary case is simulated. A triplet module which takes advantage of cell-to-cell coupling to reduce reflected wake potential is presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it