The α-arrestin SUP-13/ARRD-15 promotes isoform turnover of actin-interacting protein 1 in <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i> striated muscle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Precise arrangement of actin, myosin, and other regulatory components in a sarcomeric pattern is critical for producing contractile forces in striated muscles. Actin-interacting protein 1 (AIP1), also known as WD-repeat protein 1 (WDR1), is one of essential factors that regulate sarcomeric assembly of actin filaments. In the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, mutation in unc-78, encoding one of the two AIP1 isoforms, causes severe disorganization of sarcomeric actin filaments and near paralysis, but mutation in sup-13 suppresses the unc-78-mutant phenotypes to restore nearly normal sarcomeric actin organization and worm motility. Here, we identified that sup-13 is a nonsense allele of arrd-15 encoding an α-arrestin. The sup-13/arrd-15 mutation suppressed the phenotypes of unc-78 null mutant but required aipl-1 that encodes a second AIP1 isoform. aipl-1 was normally expressed highly in embryos and downregulated in mature muscle. However, in the sup-13/arrd-15 mutant, the AIPL-1 protein was maintained at high levels in adult muscle to compensate for the absence of the UNC-78 protein. The sup-13/arrd-15 mutation caused accumulation of ubiquitinated AIPL-1 protein, suggesting that a normal function of sup-13/arrd-15 is to enhance degradation of ubiquitinated AIPL-1, thereby promoting transition of AIP1 isoforms from AIPL-1 to UNC-78 in developing muscle. These results suggest that α-arrestin is a novel factor to promote isoform turnover by enhancing protein degradation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".