Sylvia Van Kirk: A Feminist Appreciation of Front-line Work in the Academy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
the 18 women and two men attending a course called History of Women in Canada" at the University of Toronto, wrote a Globe and Mail reporter in spring 1976, "could hardly wait to comment on their own experiences when instructor Sylvia Van Kirk introduced the subject of women's rights in Canada. " The journalist, Constance Mungall, went on to describe the course-a new third-year seminar being offered by the (now defunct) interdisciplinary studies department at the University of Toronto-and the class ("After the vote: Did it make any difference?") she had just observed. Sylvia had promoted discussion in the seminar by noting that "in the 1930s suffragette Nellie McClung had said the place of women in dating is 'to waitwaitwait'" and then asking if they thought it was still true today. Various students jumped in with their opinion and "the consensus was that it's still the same and it's hypocritical. "
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".