MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387570378 · doi:10.1002/cctc.202300989

Synthetic Applications of Photochemically Generated Radicals from Protic C(sp<sup>3</sup>)−H Bonds

2023· article· en· W4387570378 on OpenAlexafffund
Tegan E. O’Brien, Avery O. Morris, Lucas F. Villela, Louis Barriault

Bibliographic record

VenueChemCatChem · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadical Photochemical Reactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRadicalChemistryElectrophileNucleophilePhotochemistryReactivity (psychology)Surface modificationProtonYield (engineering)Electron transferProton-coupled electron transferOrganic synthesisOrganic chemistryCatalysisPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The utilization of photo‐induced processes in C−H functionalization via radical pathways has emerged as a highly promising strategy for the preparation and modification of complex organic compounds. While current methods for generating carbon‐centred radicals from C−H bonds primarily focus on hydridic C−H bonds to yield nucleophilic radical species, the reactivity and potential applications of electrophilic radicals derived from protic C−H bonds remain largely unexplored. In this review, we aim to shed light on the seminal findings regarding the activation of protic C(sp3)−H bonds while also showcasing noteworthy examples of this radical formation process. Mechanistically diverse modes of activation are discussed, unified by proton‐coupled electron transfer (PCET) concepts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemCatChemSame topicRadical Photochemical ReactionsFrench-language works237,207