P‐BB‐3 | A Case of <i>Brucella abortus</i> RB51‐Positive Platelet Unit Culture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eligibility requirements for apheresis platelet donors include “feeling well” on the day of donation, completing an abbreviated physical exam and completing the donor questionnaire which includes a donor's history of receiving live vaccines. We report the first case of Brucella abortus RB51 bacteria from a live attenuated cattle vaccine strain contaminating a platelet donation. The RB51 vaccine strain is approved to control brucellosis transmission in cattle in the United States. In October 2022, a 65-year-old male donor, with a 104 platelet-donation history, donated apheresis platelets. The donor was in good health and met all eligibility criteria. He had no other relevant medical conditions and was not taking any medications. He is self-employed as a large animal veterinarian, mostly involved in cattle work, regularly administering animal vaccinations including RB51 as well as assisting birthing in cattle and pigs. Donor reported no recognized breaks in infection control. He has no pertinent travel history, nor does he work with animals from outside the United States. Additionally, he denied consumption of unpasteurized dairy products and had no recognized parenteral exposures to animals or biologics. A single product was collected on a Trima Accel V7 (Terumo BCT, Lakewood CO). The unit underwent large volume delayed sampling (BacT\Alert, bioMérieux, Durham, NC). The anaerobic bottle was positive at 3 days, 17 h after inoculation. The initial Gram stain reported “no organisms seen.” After additional incubation, the final Gram stain interpretation from the blood was “gram negative rods.” The isolate was subsequently identified by biochemical and molecular testing as the Brucella abortus RB51 vaccine strain, which is rifampicin resistant, confirmed by whole genome sequencing at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Bacterial Special Pathogens Branch. The donor was notified, referred to an infectious disease specialist and treated with doxycycline (100 mg BID) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (160 mg/800 mg BID) for 28 days. Clinical blood cultures were negative prior to, and remained negative, after treatment. The donor was indefinitely deferred until the regimen was complete with release from medical care, plus an additional 1 year. The donated unit was interdicted prior to transfusion. This case represents an unrecognized occupational exposure to the B. abortus RB51 attenuated vaccine strain, though the exact mechanism of transmission remains unclear. This case highlights the importance of bacterial strain identification in assessing epidemiologic risks and proper therapy, a potential weakness of current donor screening practices for higher-risk occupational groups
Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.
How this classification was reachedexpand
The three-model screen
all 5,600 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Transfusion medicine case report of a contaminated platelet unit; donor screening is clinical practice, not research practice.
The case report concerns bacterial contamination of a platelet donation, not research practice.
Case report of Brucella contamination of a platelet unit; transfusion medicine, not research practice.
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".