P‐BB‐3 | A Case of <i>Brucella abortus</i> RB51‐Positive Platelet Unit Culture
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Eligibility requirements for apheresis platelet donors include “feeling well” on the day of donation, completing an abbreviated physical exam and completing the donor questionnaire which includes a donor's history of receiving live vaccines. We report the first case of Brucella abortus RB51 bacteria from a live attenuated cattle vaccine strain contaminating a platelet donation. The RB51 vaccine strain is approved to control brucellosis transmission in cattle in the United States. In October 2022, a 65-year-old male donor, with a 104 platelet-donation history, donated apheresis platelets. The donor was in good health and met all eligibility criteria. He had no other relevant medical conditions and was not taking any medications. He is self-employed as a large animal veterinarian, mostly involved in cattle work, regularly administering animal vaccinations including RB51 as well as assisting birthing in cattle and pigs. Donor reported no recognized breaks in infection control. He has no pertinent travel history, nor does he work with animals from outside the United States. Additionally, he denied consumption of unpasteurized dairy products and had no recognized parenteral exposures to animals or biologics. A single product was collected on a Trima Accel V7 (Terumo BCT, Lakewood CO). The unit underwent large volume delayed sampling (BacT\Alert, bioMérieux, Durham, NC). The anaerobic bottle was positive at 3 days, 17 h after inoculation. The initial Gram stain reported “no organisms seen.” After additional incubation, the final Gram stain interpretation from the blood was “gram negative rods.” The isolate was subsequently identified by biochemical and molecular testing as the Brucella abortus RB51 vaccine strain, which is rifampicin resistant, confirmed by whole genome sequencing at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Bacterial Special Pathogens Branch. The donor was notified, referred to an infectious disease specialist and treated with doxycycline (100 mg BID) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (160 mg/800 mg BID) for 28 days. Clinical blood cultures were negative prior to, and remained negative, after treatment. The donor was indefinitely deferred until the regimen was complete with release from medical care, plus an additional 1 year. The donated unit was interdicted prior to transfusion. This case represents an unrecognized occupational exposure to the B. abortus RB51 attenuated vaccine strain, though the exact mechanism of transmission remains unclear. This case highlights the importance of bacterial strain identification in assessing epidemiologic risks and proper therapy, a potential weakness of current donor screening practices for higher-risk occupational groups
Conservé avec la notice de tri, où il sert de preuve aux étiquettes ci-dessus.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Le tri à trois modèles
les 5 600 travaux triés →Les trois modèles l'ont jugé hors champ.
Transfusion medicine case report of a contaminated platelet unit; donor screening is clinical practice, not research practice.
The case report concerns bacterial contamination of a platelet donation, not research practice.
Case report of Brucella contamination of a platelet unit; transfusion medicine, not research practice.
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».