Retrieval of Surface Soil Moisture over Wheat Fields during Growing Season Using C-Band Polarimetric SAR Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate estimation and regular monitoring of soil moisture is very important for many agricultural, hydrological, or climatological applications. Our objective was to evaluate potential contributions of polarimetry to soil moisture estimation during crop growing cycles using RADARSAT-2 C-band images. The research focused on wheat field data collected during Soil Moisture Active Passive Validation Experiment (SMAPVEX12) conducted in 2012 in Manitoba (Canada). A sensitivity analysis was performed to select the most relevant non-polarimetric and polarimetric variables extracted from RADARSAT-2, and statistical models were developed to estimate soil moisture. In fine, three models were developed and validated: a non-polarimetric model based on cross-polarized backscattering coefficient σHV0; a polarimetric mixed model using six polarimetric and non-polarimetric retained variables after the sensitivity analysis; and a simplified polarimetric mixed model considering only the phase difference (ϕHH−VV) and the co-polarized backscattering coefficient σHH0. The validation reveals significant positive contributions of polarimetry. It shows that the non-polarimetric model has a much larger error (RMSE = 0.098 m3/m3) and explains only 19% of observed soil moisture variation compared to the polarimetric mixed model, which has an error of 0.087 m3/m3, with an explained variance of 44%. The simplified model has the lowest error (0.074 m3/m3) and explains 53.5% of soil moisture variation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".