MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387578272 · doi:10.1111/trf.395_17554

P‐TS‐58 | Multiple Rapid Allo‐immunizations and Severe DHTR After Massive Transfusion of RhD‐positive RBC in a RhD‐negative Recipient: Case Report and Literature Review

2023· article· en· W4387578272 on OpenAlexaff
Mingma Sherpa, D. Parbs, Karl Reiter, Emily M. Webb, D. Hermelin, Bryan John Wellman, Ruchika Goel

Bibliographic record

VenueTransfusion · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood groups and transfusion
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRh blood group systemHemolysisAntibodyCryoprecipitateRed CellBlood transfusionPacked red blood cellsFresh frozen plasmaRed blood cellABO blood group systemInternal medicineSurgeryImmunologyPlatelet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction (DHTR) is defined by the National Health Safety Network (NHSN) as a reaction that occurs between 24 h and 28 days after cessation of transfusion, with and newly identified red blood cell antibody and signs of hemolysis, increased LDH and bilirubin, and a positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT). Several studies have reported the incidence of DHTR at approximately 1 in 800 patients. Red cell antibodies in the Rh, Kell, Duffy, and Kidd blood group systems have been reported to be most common antibodies causing DHTR. We report an unusual case of rapid alloimmunization with multiple, sequential antibodies leading to severehemolysis in a RhD-negative male patient shortly after massive transfusion of RhD-positive red cells with no prior transfusion history. A 21-year-old male patient, in a motor vehicle related accident with major pelvic fractures and internal soft tissue injury. He received 30, O-RhD-positive RBCs, 23 fresh frozen plasma, 7 apheresis platelets, and 4 bags of pooled cryoprecipitate over 24 h. On Day 5, his antibody screen was negative, but required two O-RhD-negative units upon a sudden drop in hemoglobin and >2 g/dL rise in bilirubin. Type and screen, DAT, antibody identification, and elution studies were performed using standard blood bank and reference lab techniques. On day 11, a strong anti-D was detected in the plasma and the DAT was positive for IgG(3+) and C3 (1+). On day 17, anti-Jka was identified in the plasma, and the anti-D was identified in the eluate. Patient received two additional O, RhD-negative, Jk (a−), RBC due to worsening anemia and ongoing evidence of hemolysis. On Day 19, anti-E was identified in the plasma. To provide phenotype matched blood, red cell genotyping was performed which offered the C-, E-, K-, Fya-, Jka-, S-phenotype. On day 26, a warm autoantibody was detected and the anti-Jka in the eluate. Finally, anti-C and anti-K were identified on Day 29. His hemolysis gradually improved, and the DAT converted to negative. A clinical timeline of patient's progress has been shown in Figure 1. FIGURE 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.514
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransfusionSame topicBlood groups and transfusionFrench-language works237,207