MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387578978 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.086019

Causal connectability between quantum systems and the black hole interior in holographic duality

2023· article· en· W4387578978 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Samuel Leutheusser, Hong Liu

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHigh Energy PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsEvent horizonDuality (order theory)Boundary (topology)Membrane paradigmBlack hole (networking)HorizonObserver (physics)Theoretical physicsPhysicsBlack hole information paradoxHolographySeries (stratigraphy)Nonsingular black hole modelsOperator (biology)Black hole thermodynamicsExtremal black holeQuantum mechanicsMathematicsMicro black holeMathematical analysisPure mathematicsCharged black holeComputer scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a series of two papers, the authors explore the holographic duality between an eternal AdS black hole in the bulk and two copies of the boundary CFT in the thermal field double state. They provide an explicit construction in the boundary theory of an evolution operator for a bulk in-falling observer, thus making manifest the boundary emergence of the black hole horizons, the interiors, and the associated causal structure. They also elucidate that the emergence of the sharp bulk event horizon is related to the infinite N limit of the boundary theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.009
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations91
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsFrench-language works237,207