MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387581159 · doi:10.5406/23300833.80.2.05

Seeing <i>Footprints of Polonia</i>

2023· article· en· W4387581159 on OpenAlex
Jerome Krase

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolish American Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPolish-Jewish Holocaust Memory Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFaithEthnic groupAssertionImmigrationHistorySociologyAnthropologyPhilosophyArchaeologyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I am a visually oriented social scientist whose primary focus is on ethnicity and urban society and for whom Poland and Polonia have been important subjects. Therefore, the first question that arose when I received for review Footprints of Polonia: Polish Historical Sites Across North America, which I read as an updated and revised Polish Heritage and Travel Guide to U.S.A. and Canada, was, “Should this book be deposited on my library shelf or on my coffee table?” After carefully going through it, as it is not a book to be read in the usual sense, I placed it with other valuable scholarly resources on the shelves of my library. In brief, I found it to be of great value not only to Polish and Polonia studies, but also more broadly to my related visual, urban, im/migration, and ethnic scholarly interests.Beyond the numerous individual geographical place entries, many of which were totally new to me, I found much in the way of scholarly reassurance in the book's front matter, some of which is key to my current evaluation. For example, in the prologue to the first edition, the late Stanislaus Blejwas (1941–2001) successfully appealed to my interest in immigrant religious architecture: “The churches are often on a grand scale, they are testimony to the faith, for God must be worshiped in a great house. They are also an assertion of the Polish presence. God's Polish house had to rival American churches. The immigrant, despite enormous difficulties and exploitative working conditions, manifested pride in his accomplishments in ‘Ameryka,’ pointedly reminding his American neighbors by the size and beauty of his Polish churches that he was just as good as any other citizen, and here to stay” (p. xiv). In my own excursions through America's Polonia, I have noticed that some of these churches and related buildings and monuments, especially in the central city, remain for the spiritual benefit of others even as the original worshipers and builders moved to “greener” pastures.The prologue to the second edition by Anna D. Jaroszyńska-Kirchmann mimics the best and brightest insights from urban and cultural studies; including my own work on the changing appearance of cities around the globe:1 “The structure and design of cities on the North American continent is ever-changing, and nobody can predict what the future will bring. Any city on the continent can be read as a text that informs us about the lives, experiences, and aspirations of its past and present residents. Physical manifestations of belonging are important symbols and expressions of both continuity and discontinuity and create a sense of place for the Polish diaspora. This book aims to guide us through the process of cataloguing, preserving, and understanding the past as well as celebrating and commemorating it” (p. xix). To her enticing introduction, I would add that the visible and invisible impacts of Polish immigrants on places of all sizes in the Western Hemisphere are valuable contributions to the collective heritage of everyone.For social scientists and historians interested in migration, Footprints of Polonia is an extremely valuable resource for locating the numerous places where Poles in the Americas have left their mark. Perhaps those with a solid knowledge of global immigration patterns might have guessed some of these locations, but they are not easily found in the academic literature. In my opinion, this critical absence is because the history of Central and Eastern Europe itself, as well as its many diasporas, continue to be cultural, social, as well as geographical terrae incognitae—except for those committed to Polish and Polonia studies. What I found especially interesting were those places outside of major cities such as Chicago and New York in the eastern and midwestern United States. More important would be revealing why Poles settled where they did and why they stayed or moved on.Other takeaways from Footprints for scholars of ethnicity, immigration, and assimilation are “What do ethnic groups celebrate and why?” The book offers insight into what it is that more and less informed people of Polish descent designate as important to them. As with other ethnic groups I have studied, there are the usual suspects among the myriad contributions Polish immigrants and their descendants made to communities throughout the hemisphere in the form of monuments, bridges, churches, cultural centers, and cemeteries across the continent. They often commemorate key events and historical figures, such as Casimir Pulaski and movements like Solidarity, that are a source of pride among Polish Americans. Here I should add the equal devotion of Italian Americans for statues and place names of Christopher Columbus. And, as with other groups, for me the most valuable contributions to treasured spaces and places were those made by the toiling masses as opposed to the elites, who are much easier to track in both the written and visual records.I have studied the vernacular landscapes of both Poland and Polonia.2Among those in the United States have been current impacts and lingering traces of previous Polish residents in major cities including Chicago, Illinois, Cleveland, Ohio, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota, New York City, New Britain, Connecticut, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and Seattle, Washington, as well as many “small” local scenes such as the tiny village of Housatonic, Massachusetts. In a related visual research vein, I recently made two visits, one with Fulbright Visiting Scholar Anna Fin, to visit the 150th Anniversary Celebration of The Church of St. Stanislaus Bishop and Martyr and viewed the otherwise waning impacts of Central and East European immigration to Manhattan's Lower East Side. While it is not yet obliterated by the burgeoning young, college, gentrifier and hipster cultural scenes, it is obvious that unless accommodations are made for the new population, for example as in Greenpoint, Brooklyn, very few retail stores will survive.I look forward to the future research this book will stimulate, as noted by the editor, Ewa E. Barczyk: “Future plans include the development of an interactive online site with maps, photos, and pinned locations that could be used on a phone when traveling. Many more sites were identified during the research for this book that could not be included so there is already an extensive base for a larger, more comprehensive project” (p. x).As to a minor issue, although most entries also include a color photo, in most cases the image, although of high quality, is too small for full appreciation. However, I do understand from my own work that the publication of larger images, especially those in the glossy form found in the book, make the price of the book prohibitive. Therefore, the inclusion of website links was greatly appreciated. Finally, the scholarly value of Footprints would also be enhanced by the generation of comparative studies of other ethnic and immigrant groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it