Multimodal Investigation of Deep Gray Matter Nucleus in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Their Clinical Correlations: A Multivariate Pattern Analysis Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep gray matter (DGM) nucleus are involved in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and are strongly associated with clinical symptoms. We used machine learning approach to further explore microstructural alterations in DGM of MS patients. One hundred and fifteen MS patients and seventy-one healthy controls (HC) underwent brain MRI. The fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), quantitative susceptibility value (QSV) and volumes of the caudate nucleus (CN), putamen (PT), globus pallidus (GP), and thalamus (TH) were measured. Multivariate pattern analysis, based on a machine-learning algorithm, was applied to investigate the most damaged regions. Partial correlation analysis was used to investigate the correlation between MRI quantitative metrics and clinical neurological scores. The area under the curve of FA-based classification model was 0.83, while they were 0.93 for MD and 0.81 for QSV. The Montreal cognitive assessment scores were correlated with the volume of the DGM and the expanded disability status scale scores were correlated with the MD of the GP and PT. The study results indicated that MS patients had involvement of DGM with the CN being the most affected. The atrophy of DGM in MS patients mainly affected cognitive function and the microstructural damage of DGM was mainly correlated with clinical disability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".