The Mediating Role of College Students' Self-Efficacy: The Relationship between the Big Five Personality Traits and Entrepreneurial Intention
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research paper explores the relationship between the Big Five personality traits, college students' self-efficacy, and their entrepreneurial intentions. By examining how individual characteristics influence one's inclination towards entrepreneurship, this study provides valuable insights for fostering an entrepreneurial spirit among college students. The Big Five personality traits - extraversion, conscientiousness, openness to experience, agreeableness, and emotional stability - play a significant role in shaping entrepreneurial behavior. Additionally, college students' self-efficacy, or their belief in their ability to succeed, influences their entrepreneurial intentions. Understanding these dynamics can inform strategies to promote entrepreneurship, such as incorporating relevant educational programs and fostering an environment that nurtures entrepreneurial aspirations. By recognizing the importance of personality traits and self-efficacy in entrepreneurial intentions, educators and policymakers can contribute to cultivating a generation of aspiring entrepreneurs who drive innovation and economic growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it