MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387595188 · doi:10.1515/9780887555893-001

Acknowledgements

2019· book-chapter· en· W4387595188 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Manitoba Press eBooks · 2019
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is becoming an increasingly common practice in Canada and in other settler countries to begin public events with a territorial acknowledgement that references the original Indigenous peoples of the land.Sometimes this includes a few words of thanks for their stewardship and/or hospitality.Although these acknowledgements trace their origins to Indigenous diplomatic protocols of respect and relationship building, today this practice often seems to be treated as a minor chore, with little thought given to the importance of the acknowledgement.As editors of a book that is concerned with how relations to territory are shaped by political forces, we feel it is important to reflect upon and acknowledge the peoples, territories, and relations that have made this book possible.To acknowledge people and place requires us to locate ourselves in relation to the peoples and places we write about.As co-editors, we came together with a shared set of questions about the ways that Indigeneity and settler colonialism are theorized-or under-theorized-in urban studies.We recognize the history of and problems with extractive work done by outsiders to the Prairies.Scholars such as Vine Deloria Jr., Linda Tuhiwai Smith, and Margaret Kovach have called upon researchers to be accountable to communities.While some of us are currently outsiders to the region, most of us have a long history on the Prairies.For some of us this relates to ancestral connections to Indigenous communities, while others descend from settlers.We all share a conviction that not only are the Prairies an important place to understand settler colonialism and Indigenous resurgence, but that this work must be done in connection with people in the region.Throughout the development of this project, we have relied upon the guidance of numerous individuals and institutions located in the region, and we are grateful for the support they have provided.Of course, the responsibility for any shortcomings in this collection belongs to the editors alone.This project began with a workshop, held at the University of Winnipeg in the fall of 2016.This event brought contributors to this collection together with a range of activists and Indigenous community leaders to talk about the relationships between settler colonialism and urban life.Mitch Bourbonniere,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Manitoba Press eBooksSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207