RAVAR: a curated repository for rare variant–trait associations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rare variants contribute significantly to the genetic causes of complex traits, as they can have much larger effects than common variants and account for much of the missing heritability in genome-wide association studies. The emergence of UK Biobank scale datasets and accurate gene-level rare variant-trait association testing methods have dramatically increased the number of rare variant associations that have been detected. However, no systematic collection of these associations has been carried out to date, especially at the gene level. To address the issue, we present the Rare Variant Association Repository (RAVAR), a comprehensive collection of rare variant associations. RAVAR includes 95 047 high-quality rare variant associations (76186 gene-level and 18 861 variant-level associations) for 4429 reported traits which are manually curated from 245 publications. RAVAR is the first resource to collect and curate published rare variant associations in an interactive web interface with integrated visualization, search, and download features. Detailed gene and SNP information are provided for each association, and users can conveniently search for related studies by exploring the EFO tree structure and interactive Manhattan plots. RAVAR could vastly improve the accessibility of rare variant studies. RAVAR is freely available for all users without login requirement at http://www.ravar.bio.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.060 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.022 | 0.022 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.129 | 0.112 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".