High accuracy key feature extraction approach for the non-stationary signals measurement based on NGO-VMD noise reduction and CNN-LSTM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The effective extraction of key features in non-stationary signals measurement is crucial in numerous engineering fields, including fault diagnosis, geological exploration, and state detection. To accomplish a more accurate and efficient extraction of key feature information from non-stationary signals, we design a novel approach based on variational mode decomposition (VMD) optimization by northern goshawk optimization (NGO) algorithm, convolutional neural network (CNN), and long short-term memory network (LSTM). First, NGO is used to optimize multiple intrinsic mode functions of VMD and reconstruct the signal according to the linear correlation method. Subsequently, the features of moving root mean square, moving kurtosis, and upper envelope are calculated, thereby constructing the feature matrix. Finally, the CNN-LSTM model is established with the chosen optimal hyperparameters prior to the training phase. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed NGO-VMD-CNN-LSTM method, with a high accuracy reaching 98.22%, can more accurately extract the key information of typical non-stationary signals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".