MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387609283 · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3324371

DTITD: An Intelligent Insider Threat Detection Framework Based on Digital Twin and Self-Attention Based Deep Learning Models

2023· article· en· W4387609283 on OpenAlexaff
Zhi Qiang Wang, Abdulmotaleb El Saddik

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInsider threatComputer scienceInsiderDeep learningArtificial intelligenceTransformerEmbeddingSentenceMachine learningConvolutional neural networkComputer securityEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Latest statistics and studies shows that the loss generated by insider threats is much higher than the external attacks. More and more organizations are increasing invest or purchase insider threat detection system to prevent insider risks. However, accurately and timely detecting insider threat face huge challenges. In this paper, we proposed an intelligent insider threat detection framework based on Digital Twin and self-attentions based deep learning model. First, this paper introduced what the insider threats are and the challenges of detecting them. Then this paper showed related recent works on solving insider threat detection problems and their limitations. Next, this paper proposed our solutions to address these challenges: building the innovative intelligent insider threat detection framework based on Digital Twin (DT) and self-attention based deep learning models, performing insight analysis of users’ behavior and entities, adopting contextual word embedding techniques using Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model and sentence embedding technique using Generative Pre-trained Transformer 2 (GPT-2) model to make data augmentation to overcome significant data imbalance, and adopting temporal semantic representation of users’ behaviors to build user behavior time sequence. After that, this paper built self-attention based deep learning models to quickly detect insider threat. This paper proposed a simplified transformer model named DistilledTrans and applied original transformer model, DistilledTrans, BERT + final layer, Robustly Optimized BERT Approach (RoBERTa) + final layer, and the hybrid method combining pre-trained (BERT, RoBERTa) with Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) or Long Short-term Memory (LSTM) network model to detect insider threats. Finally, this paper showed experiment results on dense dataset CERT r4.2 and augmented sporadic dataset CERT r6.2, evaluated their performance and made comparison analysis with the state-of-the-art models. Promising experimental results shows that 1) contextual word embedding insert and substitution predicted by BERT model, and context embedding sentence predicted by GPT-2 model are effective data augmentation approaches to address highly data imbalance 2) DistilledTrans trained with sporadic dataset CERT r6.2 augmented by contextual embedding sentence method predicted by GPT-2 outperforms the state-of-the-art models in term of all evaluation metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC. Additionally, its structure is much simpler and thus training time and computing cost are much less than the recent models 3) When trained with the dense dataset CERT r4.2, Pre-trained models BERT plus a final layer or RoBERTa plus a final layer can get significantly higher performance than the current models with a very little sacrifice of precision. In compassion, complex hybrid methods may not be necessary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicSupply Chain Resilience and Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207