MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387612647 · doi:10.1111/pai.14036

Editorial comment on “The alternative bile acid pathway can predict food allergy persistence in early childhood”

2023· editorial· en· W4387612647 on OpenAlexaff
Marcelina Pyclik, Rodrigo Jiménez‐Saiz, Agnes Sze Yin Leung, Philippe Eigenmann

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMcMaster University Medical Centre
FundersFaculty of Science and Engineering, University of Manchester
KeywordsMedicinePersistence (discontinuity)Gateway (web page)Food allergyAllergyMEDLINEWorld Wide WebImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

All authors declare no competing interests in relation to this work. The peer review history for this article is available at https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway/wos/peer-review/10.1111/pai.14036.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0170.022
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Allergy and ImmunologySame topicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchFrench-language works237,207