MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387615249 · doi:10.1161/res.133.suppl_1.p3101

Abstract P3101: Dietary Nitrates Negate Beneficial Cardiac Adaptations To Aerobic Exercise In A Sex-specific Manner

2023· article· en· W4387615249 on OpenAlexaff
Elise S. Bisset, Susan E. Howlett

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlood pressureInternal medicineCardiac function curveAerobic exerciseMedicineEndocrinologyTreadmillCardiologyVO2 maxCalciumHeart rateHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dietary supplements such as nitrates are commonly combined with aerobic exercise with the idea that this will improve performance and cardiac function. Whether this combination leads to beneficial effects on cardiac function at the cellular level is unclear, and few studies have used females. We determined whether dietary nitrates and/or aerobic exercise improves fitness and cardiovascular health in adult mice (both sexes) and explored underlying mechanisms. C57Bl/6 mice (9-mos) were given 1mM sodium nitrate (drinking water) and/or access to a running wheel for 3 mos. Cardiac function (echocardiography), blood pressure (tail cuff) and fitness (treadmill) were measured in mice at endpoint; calcium transients (Fura-2) and calcium currents were measured in isolated ventricular myocytes at endpoint. Exercised mice had better fitness and improved cardiac function when compared to sedentary mice, regardless of sex. Nitrates had no effect on blood pressure, total voluntary wheel running, or endpoint fitness measured as distance to exhaustion (242 ± 28 vs 294 ± 37 m, p=0.29; 122 ± 29 vs 136 ± 16 m, p=0.69 in females and males, respectively) compared to exercised controls. However, nitrates combined with exercise impaired cardiac function in a sex-specific manner. Nitrate-treated male mice who exercised had lower E/A ratios (1.8 ± 0.3 vs 1.3 ± 0.1, p=0.01) and thus worse diastolic function than control exercised male mice. By contrast, nitrate-treated female mice who exercised had smaller global longitudinal strain (-19.5 ± 1.5 vs -11.8 ± 3.0%, p=0.01) than control exercised mice, indicative of worse systolic function. Corresponding changes were seen at the cellular level. Male mice given nitrates had slower times to 50% calcium transient decay than controls (44.8 ± 4 vs 73.8 ± 6 ms, p=0.01), while females given nitrates had slower velocity to peak calcium (0.031 ± 0.004 vs 0.018 ± 0.003 μm/ms, p=0.005). These changes in calcium transients were attributable, at least in part, to corresponding changes in calcium currents. Thus, exercise improves fitness regardless of nitrates and promotes beneficial cardiac adaptations in systolic and diastolic function, but these benefits are negated when exercise is combined with dietary nitrates in a sex-specific fashion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation ResearchSame topicCardiovascular and exercise physiologyFrench-language works237,207