MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387618468 · doi:10.1063/5.0167280

Experimental investigation of combustion instability in a centrally staged combustor under self-excited oscillation conditions

2023· article· en· W4387618468 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Guelph
KeywordsCombustorPhysicsMechanicsOscillation (cell signaling)Particle image velocimetryInstabilityLimit cycleCombustionTurbulenceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an experimental investigation of combustion instability and flame dynamics in a laboratory-scale lean premixed prevaporized centrally staged combustor under self-excited oscillations. The macrostructure of the flame is captured by CH* chemiluminescence images using a high-speed camera, and the two-dimensional flow field of the combustor center plane is obtained by using particle image velocimetry. The effects of the pilot stage swirl number and main stage equivalent ratio on the thermoacoustic oscillations and flame dynamics are analyzed. The results indicate that there are intermittent oscillations, limit cycle oscillations, and mode switching in the combustor. As the pilot stage swirl number increases, the system transitions from intermittent oscillation to limit cycle oscillation. Additionally, the case with a pilot stage swirl number of 0.5 also occurs mode switching. Based on dynamic mode decomposition, the heat release fluctuation is primarily concentrated in the shear layers under different operating conditions. Furthermore, the intensity of thermoacoustic oscillations in a system is determined by the coupling strength between pressure and heat release fluctuations. From the results of the flow field, it is observed that as the pilot stage swirl number increases, the time-averaged axial strain rates and vorticities increase, but the time-averaged axial velocity is generally lower for the swirl number of 0.7 compared to the other two cases. On the other hand, the time-averaged axial strain rates and vorticities for the case with a swirl number of 0.5 decrease with the increase in the main stage equivalence ratio before and after the mode switching.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.473
Threshold uncertainty score0.542

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it