Abstract P2072: Chronic Treatment With An Androgen Receptor Antagonist Promotes Maladaptive Structural And Functional Cardiac Remodeling In Aging Male Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Testosterone levels decrease with age in men, while the risk for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) increases dramatically. Indeed, low circulating testosterone levels in men are associated with diseases such as heart failure. Testosterone exerts its effects via androgen receptors, which are even present in the heart. In addition, androgen receptor antagonists are used to treat prostate cancer in older men who may also have CVD. We investigated the effects of the androgen receptor antagonist flutamide on cardiac structure and function in aged mice. Twenty-month-old male C57BL/6 mice were treated with flutamide for 90 days (slow-release pellet implant; ~20mg/kg/day). In-vivo heart structure/function was assessed using echocardiography and then hearts were Langendorff-perfused to assess load-independent ventricular function ex-vivo . Androgen receptor blockade via flutamide caused maladaptive ventricular remodeling. In-vivo studies showed that flutamide-treated mouse hearts had smaller left ventricular inner diameters when compared to vehicle-treated mice ( e.g. , diastolic: 4.7 ± 0.1 vs. 4.4 ± 0.1 mm; p=0.01; n=8,7). Flutamide also caused left ventricular (LV) atrophy with thinner posterior walls (0.91 ± 0.07 vs. 0.74 ± 0.04 mm; p=0.05) and reduced LV mass when compared to vehicle controls (140 ± 12 vs. 105 ± 6 mg; p=0.03). Ex-vivo functional assessment showed a marked reduction in LV developed pressure in the flutamide-treated mice (111 ± 11 vs. 71 ± 3 mmHg; p<0.01). These mice also had significantly slower rates of LV pressure rise (+dP/dT=2219 ± 263 vs. 1406 ± 95 mmHg/s; p<0.01) as well as LV pressure decay (-dP/dT=-1975 ± 263 vs. -1327 ± 132 mmHg/s; p=0.04). This indicates that flutamide-treated mice had defects in both systolic and diastolic cardiac function. These results demonstrate that suppressing the effects of testosterone by blocking androgen receptors promotes maladaptive structural remodeling of the left ventricle and promotes systolic and diastolic dysfunction in hearts from aged male mice. This study suggests that chronic treatment with androgen receptor antagonists may induce cardiac dysfunction in older men, which has implications for individuals taking these medications for prostate cancer treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".