Abstract P1149: Junctophilin-2 Promotes Cardiomyocyte Survival By Blocking Murf1-mediated Junctin Ubiquitination And Proteasome-dependent Degradation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Junctophilin-2 is required for the development, maturation and integrity of the t-tubule system and the gating stability of RyR2 in cardiomyocytes. This study investigated whether and how junctophilin-2 maintained junctin, a scaffold protein stabilizing RyR2, to prevent cardiomyocyte death under stress. Methods: Cardiomyocytes were exposed to conditions of stress including palmitate, doxorubicin, or hypoxia/re-oxygenation. Adenoviral vectors were employed to manipulate expression of junctophilin-2 and junctin in cardiomyocytes. Molecular/cellular/biochemical analyses were conducted. Results: Different conditions of stress decreased junctophilin-2 expression through aberrant autophagy and concomitantly induced a reduction of junctin protein in cardiomyocytes. Over-expression of junctophilin-2 preserved the protein levels of junctin and attenuated cytosolic Ca 2+ and apoptosis in cardiomyocytes under stress. Knockdown of junctophilin-2 reproduced the detrimental phenotypes of stress in cardiomyocytes. Notably, over-expression of junctin prevented cardiomyocyte death under stress whereas knockdown of junctin offset the protective effects conferred by junctophilin-2 over-expression. Mechanistically, junctophilin-2 blocked MURF1-junctin interaction thereby preventing junctin ubiquitination and proteasome-dependent degradation. Mass spectrometry analysis identified multiple ubiquitination sites on the junctin protein and the non-ubiquitinated junctin mutant (K8R/K102R/K107R/K140R) was resistant to degradation. Conclusions: This study uncovers an unrecognized role of junctophilin-2 in preventing junctin ubiquitination and degradation in maintaining cytosolic Ca 2+ homeostasis. Junctophilin-2 and junctin represent two new survival factors of cardiomyocytes and thus, may be new therapeutic targets for cardiac protection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".