Abstract P3206: Sex-specific Differences In Proteasome Activity And Mitochondrial Function In Mouse Hearts Lacking Natriuretic Peptide Receptor A
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) is a cardiac hormone that plays an important role in cardiovascular function and energy metabolism by signaling through natriuretic peptide receptor A (NPRA). Genetic ablation of NPRA in mice resulted in hypertension, cardiac hypertrophy, and fibrosis. The cardiovascular phenotypes were reported to be more severe in male NPRA-knockout (KO) mice. It is known that reductions in proteasomal activities can lead to mitochondrial dysfunction. Similarly, an imbalance between mitochondrial fission and fusion events can impair mitochondrial function. We hypothesized that alterations in proteasomal function and mitochondrial dynamics might form the basis for phenotype differences reported for NPRA-KO mice. Method/Results: Non-invasive echocardiography, RT-QPCR, Western blotting, and proteasomal assays were performed to evaluate cardiac functions. Preliminary results revealed significant decreases in the activities of two proteasome subunits (β1 and β5) in male and female NPRA-KO hearts compared to sex-matched wild-type (WT) hearts. Notably, the percent-activity reductions were much higher in male NPRA-KO hearts. Western blotting analysis revealed that the expression levels of mitochondrial fusion proteins (Mfn1, Mfn2, and Opa1) were significantly increased in both male and female NPRA-KO hearts compared to WT controls. However, the expression of fission proteins (Drp1 & MFF) was significantly increased only in male NPRA-KO hearts. Consistent with a more imbalance in mitochondrial dynamics in male NPRA-KO hearts, the expression levels of enzymes that promote fatty acid oxidation (ECHS1 and phospho-PDH) were unfavorably altered in male but not in female NPRA-KO hearts compared to controls. In addition, various echocardiographic and electrocardiographic parameters related to the cardiac function such as cardiac output, diastolic volume, left ventricular wall thickness, QRS duration, and stroke volume, were altered significantly more in male than in female NPRA-KO hearts. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that more pronounced sex-specific alterations in proteasome/mitochondrial functions in male NPRA-KO hearts can lead to changes in cardiac metabolism and a severe disease phenotype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".