MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387623365 · doi:10.5114/ko.2023.131905

Image of serpiginous choroiditis in swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography – a review of the literature

2023· review· en· W4387623365 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Magdalena Kal, Bernadetta Płatkowska-Adamska, Mateusz Winiarczyk, Joanna Krupińska, Jerzy Mackiewicz, Dominik Odrobina, Dorota Zarębska‐Michaluk

Bibliographic record

VenueKlinika Oczna · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptical coherence tomography angiographyChoroiditisOptical coherence tomographyMedicineAngiographyRadiologyOphthalmology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AMA Kal M, Płatkowska-Adamska B, Winiarczyk M, et al. Image of serpiginous choroiditis in swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography – a review of the literature. Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica. 2023;125(3):146-150. doi:10.5114/ko.2023.131905. APA Kal, M., Płatkowska-Adamska, B., Winiarczyk, M., Krupińska, J., Mackiewicz, J., & Odrobina, D. et al. (2023). Image of serpiginous choroiditis in swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography – a review of the literature. Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica, 125(3), 146-150. https://doi.org/10.5114/ko.2023.131905 Chicago Kal, Magdalena, Bernadetta Płatkowska-Adamska, Mateusz Winiarczyk, Joanna Krupińska, Jerzy Mackiewicz, Dominik Odrobina, and Dorota Zarębska-Michaluk. 2023. "Image of serpiginous choroiditis in swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography – a review of the literature". Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica 125 (3): 146-150. doi:10.5114/ko.2023.131905. Harvard Kal, M., Płatkowska-Adamska, B., Winiarczyk, M., Krupińska, J., Mackiewicz, J., Odrobina, D., and Zarębska-Michaluk, D. (2023). Image of serpiginous choroiditis in swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography – a review of the literature. Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica, 125(3), pp.146-150. https://doi.org/10.5114/ko.2023.131905 MLA Kal, Magdalena et al. "Image of serpiginous choroiditis in swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography – a review of the literature." Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica, vol. 125, no. 3, 2023, pp. 146-150. doi:10.5114/ko.2023.131905. Vancouver Kal M, Płatkowska-Adamska B, Winiarczyk M, Krupińska J, Mackiewicz J, Odrobina D et al. Image of serpiginous choroiditis in swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography – a review of the literature. Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica. 2023;125(3):146-150. doi:10.5114/ko.2023.131905.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKlinika OcznaSame topicOcular Diseases and Behçet’s SyndromeFrench-language works237,207